Office Closure

OREA’s offices will be closed at 12:00 p.m. on Friday, December 9th, 2022. Regular business operations will resume on Monday, December 12th, 2022. Thank you.

Log in as a…



We’ve partnered with CREA to help improve your member experience and give your information the best security possible.

You will be returned to OREA once you have successfully logged in.

Login as a Member

We can help

Legal Beat: Alarm system leads to alarming lawsuit

January 2016

Legal Beat: Alarm system leads to alarming lawsuit

Legal Beat

by Merv Burgard, Q.C

It all began when a home owner arranged for an alarm system to be installed in his residence. The cost of installing the system was more than $700 and the package featured a keypad entry and basic alarm system. The owner also signed up for a monitoring service, which included a monthly charge of $45.14. A modem was installed that would trigger the monitoring device.

Some 18 months later, the same owner decided to sell his home. The agreement of purchase and sale (APS) stated: “Chattels included … Alarm system and equipment.” However, the only item listed in the Rented Equipment category was as follows: “Hot water tank with the buyer to assume the rental contract.”

In the course of the property sale, a lawsuit ensued. The buyer and seller disagreed on whether the buyer was required to assume the monthly charges for the alarm system. The seller claimed that the buyer was to have taken over the cost of the alarm modem and monitoring system.

The judge in this case ruled that the APS was a “botched” agreement. It was not made clear to the court why the seller did not have the modem and alarm monitoring system removed from his prior residence and transferred to his new residence, to minimize costs. The seller stated that he did not know where the modem had been physically located. The judge ruled that the seller was responsible for the monthly charges. The seller’s claim against the buyer was dismissed.  

Gu v Carnovale 2013 CanLII 60220

Read the January EDGE
Looking for committee volunteers
Miss Real Estate Manners: Always be professional


Mervin Burgard Q.C.

REALTORS® and lawyers should advise sellers to include a simple clause in the APS such as this one from OREA. This clause will help to prevent any confusion and unnecessary litigation.

The following equipment is rented and not included in the Purchase Price.

The Buyer agrees to assume the rental contract(s) if assumable:

(item) ....................having a payment of $.....................(monthly, quarterly, etc.)

As the OREApedia topic on Fixtures and Chattels notes:

There are a number of possible OREA standard chattels/equipment/fixtures clauses (CHATT-1 to CHATT-7) that can be included in the agreement of purchase and sale. These should be reviewed with buyers for possible inclusion and carefully explained to sellers if they are included in an offer.

Two recently introduced standard clauses are CHATT – 1, in which the seller agrees to convey all fixtures and chattels included in the purchase price free from all liens, encumbrances and claims, and CHATT – 8, which is designed to provide rental payment information for rental equipment that is being assumed by the buyer. 

Mervin Burgard, Q.C.

January EDGE
Download a text-only PDF of the January EDGE
To receive The EDGE direct to your inbox update your details now

Download a Text-only PDF of the January Realtor® Edge Newsletter

Don't miss an issue subscribe to the Realtor® Edge Newsletter

Ray Ferris

I wouldn’t have become president of OREA if it wasn’t for the top-notch training developed by OREA’s Centre for Leadership Development.

More January Realtor® Edge Articles


Slowing down: Surviving the lean season

Winter is often one of the slowest periods in real estate, you must manage the slow times in order to remain in business during the hectic seasons. Three REALTORS® from different Ontario cities share their strategies for getting through the lean times.

Read More

Campaign prevents expanded land transfer tax

A high-profile advocacy campaign to prevent the spread of the hated municipal land transfer tax has been highly successful. The Ontario Real Estate Association was vigilant in lobbying Queen’s Park to ensure the MLTT does not extend beyond Toronto.

Read More

Living beyond your means in real estate

Avoid the temptation to spend too much or abuse your credit cards when you start to succeed in the business, advises a Toronto REALTOR®.

Read More
To MP Survey
OREA Contract